● Live Wisconsin AG suit vs Kalshi & Polymarket pending · NY/IL insider-trading orders in effect · Updated May 2026
← News & Updates
Regulation

CFTC's Innovation Advisory Committee Holds Inaugural Meeting — Self-Certification Splits CME and Kalshi as Manipulation Risk Takes Centre Stage

The CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee's first meeting featured a live dispute over self-certification: CME CEO Terry Duffy argued it has allowed thousands of contracts to reach markets without scrutiny; Kalshi's Luana Lopes Lara defended it as essential to platform speed. Both Kalshi's Tarek Mansour and Polymarket's Shayne Coplan held seats on the committee. Public submissions close August 27.

The CFTC's Innovation Advisory Committee opened its first meeting on August 20 with a direct disagreement between CME Group CEO Terry Duffy and Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara over self-certification — the process that allows CFTC-licensed platforms to list new event contracts by notifying the agency rather than obtaining prior approval. Duffy argued that self-certification has enabled thousands of contracts to reach markets without adequate regulatory scrutiny, exposing the sector to manipulation and insider trading risk. Lopes Lara defended self-certification as essential, arguing that prediction markets need to move quickly when contracts relate to fast-moving events. Both Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour and Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan held committee seats, attending a session that discussed CFTC rules governing their own platforms. Public written submissions are accepted through August 27.

For UK readers, the self-certification debate maps directly onto a tension the FCA has navigated with regulated financial product approvals. UK UCITS and structured product frameworks require prior approval for new product listings in many cases; the FCA's Appointed Representatives regime has faced criticism for allowing products to reach consumers via self-certified distribution arrangements. Duffy's CME critique — that self-certification allows products to bypass substantive regulatory review — is structurally identical to criticisms levelled at the UK's Appointed Representative framework before the FCA's 2022-23 reforms tightened oversight. The difference is that prediction market self-certification is happening at the exchange level under CFTC oversight, not at the distribution level, which makes the manipulation and consumer harm risks more direct. If the CFTC's final rule on event contracts restricts or conditions self-certification in response to the IAC's discussions, it would represent a significant tightening of the listing process and would likely slow the pace at which new contract categories can be launched.

The IAC composition conflict is the parallel story. Better Markets flagged before the meeting that having prediction market CEOs advise the CFTC on rules governing their platforms mirrors letting banks chair bank supervisory committees. In the UK context, the equivalent would be inviting Betfair and Paddy Power executives to sit on an FCA panel defining gambling contract regulation — a structure the FCA would not permit under its consultation framework. CFTC Chairman Selig framed the IAC as an information-gathering mechanism, not a policy-setting body, but advisory committees shape what regulators treat as technically feasible. Duffy's manipulation critique — coming from a committee member rather than an outside critic — will appear in the IAC's formal record alongside the platforms' defences, giving CFTC staff a documented industry-internal debate to cite when drafting the final rule.

The manipulation concern Duffy raised is not abstract. The Charles de Gaulle airport temperature-manipulation incident from April 2026 — where researchers attributed temperature spikes to equipment interference aimed at winning a weather-linked prediction market contract — is the clearest existing case of the harm self-certification enables: a contract was listed without adequate scrutiny of whether its settlement mechanism was manipulation-resistant, and someone exploited that gap. The FlightAware lawsuit against Kalshi raised a related concern: flight cancellation contracts were listed using a third-party data source without a commercial agreement, naming FlightAware as the settlement oracle without its consent. Both cases involve contracts that passed through self-certification without the kind of settlement-mechanism review that Duffy is arguing the CFTC should require. The IAC's recommendation on this question — accelerate prior approval requirements, condition self-certification on manipulation-resistance standards, or maintain the status quo — will be one of the most consequential outputs from the August 20 meeting.

Recent updates


NFL Preseason Prediction Market Volume Hits $167.8M in One Week — Up 324% as Sports Season Begins

NFL prediction market volume hit $167.8 million in the week ending August 16, up 324% week-on-week. Preseason game contracts drove 85.5% of the total. One game on Kalshi hit $19.4M; Super Bowl LXI futures have accumulated $59M+. The regular season opens September 4 — the commercial test every major platform CEO has flagged as 2026's growth milestone.

Cantor Fitzgerald Opens Kalshi's Event Contracts to 3,000 Institutional Clients — Wall Street's First Block Trading Service for Prediction Markets

Cantor Fitzgerald has launched institutional block trading on Kalshi, acting as introducing broker for ~3,000 institutional clients with Susquehanna Predictions providing liquidity. Initial contracts cover weather, commodity prices, earnings, iPhone sales, and AI supply chain risks. Bernstein estimates $1 trillion annual volume by end of decade. The launch marks Wall Street's first formal institutional access service for prediction markets.

JPMorgan Cut Polymarket's Banking Ties in October 2025 Over Regulatory Concerns — and Still Wants to Underwrite Its IPO

JPMorgan Chase terminated Polymarket's banking relationship in October 2025 over regulatory concerns, the Financial Times reports, while simultaneously positioning itself for a potential IPO underwriting role. The debanking occurred before Polymarket re-entered the US market. Polymarket disputes the characterisation, saying it retains a 'close, active relationship' with JPMorgan on operational matters.