Italy Re-Bans Polymarket — Putting a $22M Lazio FC Sponsorship Deal Under Italian Criminal Law
Italy's Customs and Monopolies Agency (ADM) added Polymarket to its blacklist of blocked websites for the second time in July 2026, re-classifying it as an unlicensed gambling operator. Polymarket had won a court reversal before the TAR Lazio administrative court in late 2025. The renewed block threatens Polymarket's $22 million sponsorship deal with Lazio FC: Italian law prohibits clubs from advertising unlicensed betting operations, potentially forcing Lazio to drop the partnership.
Italy's Customs and Monopolies Agency (ADM) added Polymarket to its official list of blocked websites for the second time in July 2026, once again classifying the prediction market as an unlicensed gambling operator. The block requires Italian internet service providers to prevent residents from accessing Polymarket.com. Polymarket was first blocked by Italy in late 2025 on the same grounds, but secured a reversal before the TAR Lazio — the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio — in proceedings that allowed the site to resume Italian access in December 2025. The ADM has now re-listed the domain, effectively restarting the blocking dispute despite the earlier court outcome.
The renewed ban has immediate implications beyond platform access. Polymarket holds a $22 million sponsorship deal with S.S. Lazio, the Serie A football club based in Rome. The sponsorship gives Polymarket prominent branding at the Stadio Olimpico and across Lazio's matchday and digital assets. Under Italian law, a club cannot lawfully advertise or endorse an entity that Italian authorities classify as an unlicensed betting operation — the prohibition is enforced under the penal code, not just regulatory guidance. If the ADM's re-listing stands, Lazio faces legal exposure for continuing to display Polymarket branding, and the club may be compelled to either renegotiate the deal or terminate it outright. Polymarket has not publicly commented on the status of the Lazio partnership following the re-blocking.
The episode illustrates how prediction markets sit in a genuinely different legal position across jurisdictions depending entirely on how a regulator classifies them. Polymarket maintains that its products are financial instruments, not gambling — the same argument it uses in its US litigation. In the United States, that argument is heard in federal court with the CFTC as advocate. In Italy, the ADM has no equivalent of the CFTC's preemption doctrine, and the classification decision belongs to the gambling regulator, which has now made it twice. The TAR Lazio ruling from late 2025 did not definitively resolve the classification question; it temporarily suspended the block, and the ADM re-exercised its authority on what appear to be the same underlying grounds.
The Italian ban lands on the same day Gibraltar announced the world's first dedicated prediction markets regulatory framework — a deliberate separate licensing category that explicitly distinguishes prediction markets from gambling. The contrast is sharp: one jurisdiction in Europe is building the legal infrastructure to license and regulate prediction markets as a distinct product, while another is re-blocking the sector's most prominent international platform for the second time in six months. For Polymarket, the more urgent question is whether the Lazio deal survives. For the industry, the Italian episode is a preview of what happens when prediction markets try to operate under a legal theory of 'not gambling' in a jurisdiction whose regulator has already decided they are.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.