Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Robinhood Derivatives agreed on September 4, 2026 to stop offering new sports-related event contracts in Michigan and to close out all existing customer positions by October 9 — voluntarily pausing its Michigan sports market business under a stipulation and order signed by US District Judge Paul L. Maloney of the Western District of Michigan. The deal was publicly reported September 10. Under the agreement, Michigan officials agreed not to enforce the state's sports gambling laws against Robinhood while the company remains in compliance with the pause. The agreement does not resolve the underlying legal question of whether the Commodity Exchange Act preempts Michigan's authority to regulate CFTC-registered prediction markets as gambling, and it explicitly preserves Robinhood's preemption claim for the ongoing Sixth Circuit appeal. Robinhood stops operating Michigan sports contracts; Michigan stops enforcing against Robinhood; the courts continue working toward a legal answer.
The stipulation covers sports event contracts specifically. Robinhood's other prediction market categories — political, economic, financial, and entertainment contracts — are not addressed, and the company can presumably continue offering those to Michigan residents during the pause period. The agreement runs while the Sixth Circuit considers the Michigan appeal; it does not set an expiration date independent of the litigation timeline. Michigan has multiple concurrent Sixth Circuit appeals involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — all arising from the state's enforcement action and Judge Maloney's June 2026 preliminary injunction denial. Those appeals are expected to be briefed and argued in late 2026 or early 2027. Robinhood's stipulation sidesteps the enforcement conflict that has put smaller platforms in difficult positions — caught between CFTC emergency orders and state court mandates — while the appeals work through the system.
Legal Sports Report described the Robinhood-Michigan deal as a potential 'blueprint' for interim accommodations between prediction market platforms and states during the litigation. The appeal of the structure is clear: platforms get a defined enforcement-free period; states get voluntary compliance without expending further enforcement resources or risking adverse emergency orders from the CFTC; courts get to resolve the underlying legal question without the distraction of ongoing enforcement skirmishes. Whether other platforms in other states will reach similar stipulations depends on whether they share Robinhood's strategic calculus. Kalshi has consistently declined to reach voluntary accommodation agreements, instead contesting enforcement in court and relying on CFTC emergency orders for protection. Polymarket US has similarly contested, while generally complying with state demands more quickly than Kalshi. Robinhood's decision to negotiate a voluntary pause suggests the platform's legal team concluded that the Michigan enforcement risk, the cost of parallel litigation, and the reputational dimensions of the conflict outweighed the Michigan sports market revenue during the litigation period.
The Michigan deal has a specific commercial context: October 9 — the date Robinhood must close all Michigan customer positions — is five weeks into the NFL regular season. NFL sports contracts have been among the highest-volume products on all prediction market platforms in 2026; closing Michigan user positions in the middle of the season has real user-experience consequences. Robinhood's acceptance of that commercial cost signals that the company's Michigan legal exposure (potential $500,000-per-day state fines, contempt risk, and reputational damage from ongoing enforcement proceedings) was judged more costly than losing five weeks of NFL season access for Michigan's user base. The agreement also limits Robinhood's exposure as a defendant in any new enforcement actions that Michigan might otherwise initiate. Kalshi, which continues to operate under CFTC emergency order protection in Michigan, faces a different risk calculus — and a different outcome if the Sixth Circuit ultimately rules against the CFTC's preemption theory.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.
Polymarket Launches 20x Leveraged Perpetual Futures Across 67 Markets — International Users Only
Polymarket launched Polymarket Perps on September 3 — a perpetual futures platform with up to 20x leverage across 67 markets covering crypto, individual stocks, equity indices, and commodities including oil and gold. The product is available to international users only; US traders are blocked under the same US-exclusion policy that separates Polymarket International from the CFTC-regulated Polymarket US. The launch moves Polymarket International into direct competition with Binance, Bybit, and dYdX in the crypto derivatives space, and represents the clearest signal yet that Polymarket's international business is evolving beyond binary prediction markets toward a full-service leveraged trading platform.