CFTC's 267-Page Proposed Rule Would Allow Most Sports Contracts — But Bans Single-Play, Injury, and Officiating Bets
The CFTC's proposed prediction-market rule hit the Federal Register on 12 June 2026, opening a 45-day comment window closing 27 July. It permits sports event contracts on final scores, point differentials, win-loss, tournament advancement, and statistical performance — but disallows single-play, in-game-fight, injury, officiating, and pre-collegiate contracts via a new three-step public-interest test.
The CFTC published its long-awaited proposed prediction-market rule in the Federal Register on 12 June 2026 — a 267-page notice of proposed rulemaking that opens a 45-day public comment window closing 27 July. The headline is that the agency would expressly permit a broad category of sports event contracts: final scores, point differentials, win-loss results, tournament advancement, and individual or team statistical performance, including season-long metrics. For an industry whose entire legal exposure turns on whether sports contracts are permissible at all, an affirmative federal rule saying yes is the strongest possible foundation.
But the rule draws hard lines, and the exclusions are as important as the permissions. The proposal would disallow contracts on a 'specific play called for or executed by a specific player or team' — a single pitch in baseball, a specific play call. It would also prohibit contracts on physical fights during games, on injuries, on officiating decisions, and on pre-collegiate sporting events. The logic is a distinction between aggregate outcomes that resemble traditional financial settlement and micro-event contracts that look indistinguishable from in-play sportsbook proposition betting — exactly the products responsible-gambling advocates flag as most addictive.
The mechanism is a new three-step sequential analysis. First: is it an event contract in an excluded commodity? Second: does it 'involve' an enumerated activity — unlawful activity, terrorism, assassination, war, gaming, or 'similar activity'? Third: is the contract contrary to the public interest? The 'gaming' prong is where the action is. Critics, including former congressman Mick Mulvaney's group Gambling is Not Investing, argue sports contracts plainly involve gaming and should fail at step two. The CFTC's framework is built to push the determinative question to step three, where the agency has more discretion and where price-discovery and hedging arguments carry weight.
Two things to watch over the 45-day window. First, the comment file will become a battleground: state attorneys general, the tribal gaming coalition, sports leagues, responsible-gambling organisations, and the platforms will file duelling comments that get cited in the litigation. Second, the rule does not moot the court cases — it runs alongside them. As the 19 June Michigan ruling showed, a federal judge can still conclude sports contracts are not swaps in the first place, a question logically prior to whatever the rule permits. The likeliest endgame: the rule is finalised in early 2027, immediately challenged, and the rule's validity and the swaps question are resolved together — probably at the Supreme Court.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Crypto.com and Novig Sue Missouri as Market Leaders Hold Back — Eighth Circuit Now in Play via Iowa
Crypto.com and Novig filed federal lawsuits on October 16 challenging Missouri's cease-and-desist orders, arguing their sports event contracts fall under exclusive CFTC jurisdiction. The suits came as Missouri's 30-day compliance window closed. Notably, the market leaders — Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, and Underdog — have not sued; Missouri said it is in 'ongoing discussions' with Kalshi. The outcome is tied to the Eighth Circuit, now weighing the same question in Kalshi's Iowa appeal — the fourth federal circuit to take up the prediction market question.
Ohio Escalates Post-Sixth Circuit — Cease-and-Desist to 10 Operators, but Platforms Keep Operating
Emboldened by its Sixth Circuit win, Ohio escalated enforcement. Governor Mike DeWine and the Ohio Casino Control Commission issued cease-and-desist letters dated October 2 to 10 operators, including Polymarket and Robinhood, with an October 16 deadline and penalties up to the value gained from contracts. Kalshi was excluded because a court order already covers it. As of October 20, platforms were still operating in Ohio despite the deadline. Polymarket has sued the Commission and AG Andy Wilson; Wilson is expected to sue non-compliant operators.
Midterm Election Betting Tops $220M — Double the Entire 2024 Cycle — as Public Opposition Mounts
Traders have wagered more than $220 million on the 2026 US congressional midterms across Kalshi and Polymarket, more than double the $92 million bet across the entire 2024 cycle, according to a Reuters analysis of Anti-Corruption Data Collective data published October 14. The 2026 cycle has more than 21,000 individual markets, up from 463 in 2024. Volume is concentrated in a few races, led by the Texas Senate contest. The growth comes despite a Reuters/Ipsos poll finding most Americans oppose using prediction markets to bet on elections.