Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi petitioned the full Ninth Circuit (11 judges) for en banc rehearing of the August 28 3-0 ruling for Nevada on September 9. On the same day, Robinhood filed a separate SCOTUS certiorari petition from the same ruling, going directly to the Supreme Court. New Jersey already has a SCOTUS petition filed from the Third Circuit's April ruling. Two cert petitions now sit before SCOTUS on the prediction market question.
Kalshi petitioned the Ninth Circuit for en banc rehearing on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate sports event contracts as gambling. En banc review asks the full circuit — rather than the 3-judge panel — to reconsider a ruling. Kalshi argues the panel ruling conflicts with the Third Circuit's April ruling and that an exceptionally important preemption question requires full-court guidance. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed a separate SCOTUS certiorari petition directly challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling — bypassing the en banc step. Two platforms, one defeat, two divergent legal strategies.
For UK readers, the en banc process is closest in function to the UK Supreme Court granting leave to appeal a Court of Appeal decision, but within the same court. The Ninth Circuit's en banc procedure brings together all active circuit judges (up to 11 sit on a typical en banc panel) to reconsider a smaller panel's ruling. It is used when a losing party believes the panel ruling conflicts with established circuit precedent, creates an inter-circuit split, or raises a question of exceptional importance. Kalshi's petition cites all three. The grant rate for en banc petitions is roughly 1-2% overall, but higher when an acknowledged circuit split exists. Denying en banc here — when the Ninth Circuit panel openly acknowledged conflicting with the Third Circuit — would be unusual. Grant is more likely than average, though still far from certain.
Robinhood's direct SCOTUS petition is the more aggressive move. Rather than waiting for en banc consideration, Robinhood treats the circuit split as already established and fully briefed — which it is — and invites SCOTUS to take the case directly. New Jersey's cert petition (filed September 2) asks SCOTUS to review the Third Circuit ruling that went for Kalshi. Robinhood's petition (filed September 9) asks SCOTUS to review the Ninth Circuit ruling that went against Robinhood. The two petitions approach the same federal statutory question from opposite circuit outcomes. SCOTUS can consolidate them. With two cert petitions already docketed and a third expected from Kalshi after the en banc result, the prediction market question will be among the most-petitioned issues before the Court in its October 2026 term.
The strategy divergence between Kalshi and Robinhood likely reflects their different positions in the state enforcement landscape. Kalshi is simultaneously fighting enforcement actions in Michigan, Nevada, Washington, Connecticut, and several other states under CFTC emergency order protection; going to SCOTUS without first exhausting Ninth Circuit options could produce a Supreme Court ruling more quickly than the enforcement situation has stabilised. Robinhood — which just agreed to exit Michigan sports contracts voluntarily — has a cleaner enforcement picture and can afford to move faster toward SCOTUS without the same parallel-litigation complexity. For prediction market observers, the combination of Kalshi's en banc petition and Robinhood's direct SCOTUS petition means the legal endgame is accelerating on two tracks simultaneously, with a Massachusetts SJC decision also expected within weeks. The prediction market legal calendar in September-October 2026 is as dense as any period in the sector's history.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
The CFTC approved and Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 — the first non-cryptocurrency perps to receive US regulatory clearance. Contracts are cash-settled, perpetual, and 24/7. Kalshi has pending applications for US equities, copper, and currencies. Crypto perps have done $44 billion in notional volume since May. The launches put Kalshi in direct competition with CME and COMEX as US commodity trading venues.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives agreed on September 4, under a court-approved stipulation, to stop new Michigan sports event contracts by September 9 and close positions by October 9. Michigan will not enforce gambling laws against Robinhood while it complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps Sixth Circuit appeals on track. Legal Sports Report called it a potential blueprint for similar interim accommodations between platforms and states.
Polymarket Launches 20x Leveraged Perpetual Futures Across 67 Markets — International Users Only
Polymarket launched Polymarket Perps on September 3 — perpetual futures with up to 20x leverage across 67 markets covering stocks, crypto, indices, and commodities. Available internationally only; US users are blocked under the same jurisdiction restrictions that separate Polymarket International from the CFTC-regulated US platform. The launch puts Polymarket in direct competition with Binance Futures and dYdX and marks a significant expansion beyond binary prediction markets.