Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives agreed on September 4, under a court-approved stipulation, to stop new Michigan sports event contracts by September 9 and close positions by October 9. Michigan will not enforce gambling laws against Robinhood while it complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps Sixth Circuit appeals on track. Legal Sports Report called it a potential blueprint for similar interim accommodations between platforms and states.
Robinhood Derivatives agreed on September 4, 2026 to stop offering new sports event contracts in Michigan and close existing customer positions by October 9 — a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney. Michigan in turn agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while it complies. The deal does not resolve whether the CEA preempts Michigan's gambling authority: Robinhood preserves its preemption argument for the Sixth Circuit appeal, and the legal question proceeds. Robinhood exits Michigan sports voluntarily; Michigan exits its enforcement posture against Robinhood voluntarily. Courts continue resolving the underlying question.
For UK readers, the structure is analogous to a section 77 undertaking in UK gambling enforcement — the operator agrees to specific conduct commitments while a regulatory or legal process resolves the underlying compliance question, avoiding a full enforcement action and its associated costs. The Gambling Commission uses this mechanism to achieve interim compliance without full licence review proceedings. Michigan and Robinhood have arrived at a functionally similar arrangement through a federal court stipulation rather than a regulatory agreement. The appeal to both sides is the same in both jurisdictions: defined obligations, a pause on escalation, and a preserved path to the underlying legal question being resolved on its merits.
The deadline is commercially significant. October 9 falls five weeks into the NFL regular season, which opened September 4. Robinhood closing Michigan customer positions in active sports contracts mid-season has real user consequences. That Robinhood accepted this cost signals that the company's legal exposure in Michigan — potential $500K/day state fines, contempt proceedings, reputational damage — outweighed the Michigan NFL market revenue during the litigation period. Kalshi, which continues operating in Michigan under CFTC emergency order protection, made the opposite calculation: fight the enforcement, rely on federal protection, and take the case through the Sixth Circuit without any voluntary pause. The two approaches represent genuine strategic divergence in how platforms are managing the state enforcement risk during the litigation.
Legal Sports Report described the Robinhood-Michigan deal as a potential blueprint for similar interim accommodations elsewhere. The Sixth Circuit now has multiple pending appeals from Michigan: Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi all have proceedings in the circuit. If the Sixth Circuit takes significantly longer than expected to issue a ruling, other platforms may calculate that voluntary compliance agreements — similar to Robinhood's — are a lower-cost path through the wait than ongoing CFTC emergency order litigation and state enforcement threats. Whether Michigan will offer similar agreements to Polymarket, Coinbase, or Kalshi (which has been more confrontational) is not public. The Ninth Circuit's August 28 ruling against Kalshi, which is persuasive but not binding in the Sixth Circuit, makes Michigan's legal position stronger going into the appeals process — which may reduce the state's incentive to offer accommodations to platforms that have not already negotiated them.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanour, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinising oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures trading 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog.