Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives agreed on September 4, under a court-approved stipulation, to stop new Michigan sports event contracts by September 9 and close positions by October 9. Michigan will not enforce gambling laws against Robinhood while it complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps Sixth Circuit appeals on track. Legal Sports Report called it a potential blueprint for similar interim accommodations between platforms and states.
Robinhood Derivatives agreed on September 4, 2026 to stop offering new sports event contracts in Michigan and close existing customer positions by October 9 — a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney. Michigan in turn agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while it complies. The deal does not resolve whether the CEA preempts Michigan's gambling authority: Robinhood preserves its preemption argument for the Sixth Circuit appeal, and the legal question proceeds. Robinhood exits Michigan sports voluntarily; Michigan exits its enforcement posture against Robinhood voluntarily. Courts continue resolving the underlying question.
For UK readers, the structure is analogous to a section 77 undertaking in UK gambling enforcement — the operator agrees to specific conduct commitments while a regulatory or legal process resolves the underlying compliance question, avoiding a full enforcement action and its associated costs. The Gambling Commission uses this mechanism to achieve interim compliance without full licence review proceedings. Michigan and Robinhood have arrived at a functionally similar arrangement through a federal court stipulation rather than a regulatory agreement. The appeal to both sides is the same in both jurisdictions: defined obligations, a pause on escalation, and a preserved path to the underlying legal question being resolved on its merits.
The deadline is commercially significant. October 9 falls five weeks into the NFL regular season, which opened September 4. Robinhood closing Michigan customer positions in active sports contracts mid-season has real user consequences. That Robinhood accepted this cost signals that the company's legal exposure in Michigan — potential $500K/day state fines, contempt proceedings, reputational damage — outweighed the Michigan NFL market revenue during the litigation period. Kalshi, which continues operating in Michigan under CFTC emergency order protection, made the opposite calculation: fight the enforcement, rely on federal protection, and take the case through the Sixth Circuit without any voluntary pause. The two approaches represent genuine strategic divergence in how platforms are managing the state enforcement risk during the litigation.
Legal Sports Report described the Robinhood-Michigan deal as a potential blueprint for similar interim accommodations elsewhere. The Sixth Circuit now has multiple pending appeals from Michigan: Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi all have proceedings in the circuit. If the Sixth Circuit takes significantly longer than expected to issue a ruling, other platforms may calculate that voluntary compliance agreements — similar to Robinhood's — are a lower-cost path through the wait than ongoing CFTC emergency order litigation and state enforcement threats. Whether Michigan will offer similar agreements to Polymarket, Coinbase, or Kalshi (which has been more confrontational) is not public. The Ninth Circuit's August 28 ruling against Kalshi, which is persuasive but not binding in the Sixth Circuit, makes Michigan's legal position stronger going into the appeals process — which may reduce the state's incentive to offer accommodations to platforms that have not already negotiated them.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
The CFTC approved and Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 — the first non-cryptocurrency perps to receive US regulatory clearance. Contracts are cash-settled, perpetual, and 24/7. Kalshi has pending applications for US equities, copper, and currencies. Crypto perps have done $44 billion in notional volume since May. The launches put Kalshi in direct competition with CME and COMEX as US commodity trading venues.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi petitioned the full Ninth Circuit (11 judges) for en banc rehearing of the August 28 3-0 ruling for Nevada on September 9. On the same day, Robinhood filed a separate SCOTUS certiorari petition from the same ruling, going directly to the Supreme Court. New Jersey already has a SCOTUS petition filed from the Third Circuit's April ruling. Two cert petitions now sit before SCOTUS on the prediction market question.
Polymarket Launches 20x Leveraged Perpetual Futures Across 67 Markets — International Users Only
Polymarket launched Polymarket Perps on September 3 — perpetual futures with up to 20x leverage across 67 markets covering stocks, crypto, indices, and commodities. Available internationally only; US users are blocked under the same jurisdiction restrictions that separate Polymarket International from the CFTC-regulated US platform. The launch puts Polymarket in direct competition with Binance Futures and dYdX and marks a significant expansion beyond binary prediction markets.