Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanour, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, CEO Tarek Mansour and president Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28, 2026. Reporting describes 13 felonies and one misdemeanour, including a second-degree felony count of engaging in a 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The case stems from a September sting in which an undercover state agent placed 12 sports wagers on Kalshi, and the platform's own location-verification system confirmed the agent was physically in Utah — establishing, in the state's view, that Kalshi knowingly accepted sports wagers from a Utah user in violation of state gambling law. Kalshi called the charges a 'crazy overreach' and accused Utah of playing politics.
For UK readers, this is the difference between a regulator fining a company and a prosecutor charging named directors with crimes. Utah is the second state to bring criminal charges against Kalshi, after Arizona filed misdemeanour counts in March, but it escalates beyond Arizona in two ways. First, the charges are predominantly felonies, including the serious 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count Utah uses for organised or repeated conduct. Second, Utah charged the two co-founders personally. Naming Mansour and Lopes Lara as individual defendants turns a corporate regulatory matter into a personal criminal one for the company's leadership — a far higher-stakes form of enforcement than corporate fines or injunctions, affecting executives' travel, personal legal exposure, and the company's governance, regardless of how the preemption question is resolved.
The charges arrived one day after the CFTC sued Utah to block its enforcement, making Utah the tenth state the agency has taken to court to defend the platforms' federal jurisdiction. The sequence — CFTC sues the state to assert preemption, state files criminal charges anyway — shows how far the confrontation has escalated where states are most determined to enforce. The backdrop is unfavourable to Kalshi: a federal court in the Tenth Circuit ruled in August that federal commodities law did not preempt Utah's authority over Kalshi's sports contracts, and Kalshi is appealing. With an adverse preemption ruling already in hand, Utah is proceeding on the theory that its gambling laws apply and Kalshi's continued operation is criminal. The CFTC's suit asserts the opposite, setting up a direct federal-versus-state confrontation over whether a state can criminally prosecute conduct a federal agency says is federally authorised.
The personal charges raise the stakes for the whole sector. Until now, state enforcement has run primarily through civil mechanisms — cease-and-desist letters, injunctions, civil suits, corporate penalties. Criminal charges against named executives introduce personal jeopardy that changes the risk calculus for every operator. If Utah's charges proceed and survive the preemption defence, other states with criminal gambling statutes could follow, and prediction market executives could face personal criminal exposure across multiple jurisdictions. The CFTC's defence of the platforms does not shield individuals from state criminal liability unless a court rules that preemption bars the prosecution — the exact question now before the Supreme Court. For Kalshi's founders, the Utah charges mean the abstract preemption question pending at SCOTUS now carries concrete personal consequences, and the outcome of the federal-versus-state fight will determine not only whether their company can operate but whether they personally face felony convictions.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinising oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures trading 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog.
Pentagon Bars Personnel From Trading on Military Information After $400K Prediction Market Scandal
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued an October 20 memo barring Department of Defense personnel from making financial transactions using non-public information, explicitly naming Polymarket and Kalshi. The directive follows the prosecution of a Special Forces soldier accused of making more than $400,000 on Polymarket by betting on a mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Hegseth's rationale is a national-security concern: a bet on a military outcome creates a market signal adversaries can read. 'Our enemies watch movements in these markets,' the memo states.