Google Bans Prediction-Market Ads in Ohio — Second State After Nevada, and Regulators Weren't Told First
Google updated its US prediction-markets advertising policy to prohibit ads for prediction-market contracts in Ohio, effective June 2, 2026. Ohio joins Nevada as the only states excluded since Google opened the category in January. The Ohio Casino Control Commission says it did not request the ban — adding a new, private-sector front to a fight that has so far run through courts and statehouses.
Google has updated its prediction-markets advertising policy to prohibit ads for prediction-market contracts and related products in Ohio, effective June 2, 2026. The policy change makes Ohio the second US state excluded from the category since Google opened it in January 2026, when the company began allowing prediction-market advertising in every state except Nevada. Google's policy page states the change directly: "In June 2026, Google will update our Prediction markets policy in the United States to prohibit the advertisement of prediction markets contracts and related products ads in Ohio. Consequently, advertising of prediction markets and related products in Ohio is prohibited effective June 2, 2026." The eligibility rules elsewhere are unchanged: CFTC-registered Designated Contract Markets and National Futures Association-authorized brokerages can advertise, provided they hold Google certifications.
The notable detail is that Ohio's own gaming regulator did not ask for the ban. "The Ohio Casino Control Commission did not solicit any particular action from Google, but applauds Google for its efforts to ensure that marketing targeting Ohioans fully complies with Ohio law," OCCC interim executive director Andromeda Morrison said in a statement to Gambling Insider. Google acting ahead of — rather than in response to — a regulator's request is a meaningful data point. The likeliest reading is that Google's policy team is tracking state-level enforcement posture and de-risking proactively: Ohio sent cease-and-desist orders to Kalshi, Crypto.com, and Robinhood in April 2025, making it one of the earliest state enforcers even though it never escalated to litigation the way Arizona, Wisconsin, or Rhode Island later did.
The Ohio action adds a third front to a fight that has so far run through two: federal courts (the CFTC's six state preemption suits, with the Arizona preliminary injunction as the template) and statehouses (Minnesota's felony ban, fifteen-plus state bills). Ad-platform policy is different in kind. Google is not a party to any litigation and is under no court order; it is making a private commercial judgment about regulatory risk, state by state. That judgment matters operationally because paid search is a primary acquisition channel for every consumer trading product. A platform that wins its preemption case in federal court but cannot advertise in a state has won the legal argument and lost the growth channel. And unlike a court ruling, Google's policy can change in either direction at any time, with no docket to watch.
Two implications follow. First, the Nevada-plus-Ohio list is unlikely to stay at two. Google's stated logic — compliance with state law — applies at least as strongly to Minnesota, where operating a prediction market becomes a felony on August 1 unless the federal court intervenes. If Google applies the policy consistently, Minnesota should be the next addition, and the litigation-state list (Arizona, Wisconsin, Illinois, Connecticut, New York, Rhode Island) is the watch list after that. Second, the asymmetry hurts smaller operators most. Kalshi, Robinhood, and DraftKings have brand recognition and owned channels; a newer entrant relying on paid acquisition to build awareness in a 11.8-million-person state just lost its primary tool. For Ohio residents nothing changes about platform access itself: Kalshi, Robinhood, and the other CFTC-licensed venues remain available in Ohio. What changes is what they are allowed to show you.
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.