Kalshi Is Seeking a $40 Billion Valuation — Seven Weeks After Raising at $22 Billion
Kalshi is in talks for a new funding round at a $40 billion valuation, nearly doubling the $22 billion figure from its May 2026 Series F, according to the Financial Times. The company's annualized revenue has crossed $2 billion, and CEO Tarek Mansour confirmed the company is in early IPO discussions — though a listing will not happen before 2027. Combined Kalshi and Polymarket volume hit $44.8 billion in June, a 75% jump from May.
Kalshi is seeking a new round of outside investment at a valuation of approximately $40 billion, according to the Financial Times, just seven weeks after closing a $1 billion Series F at a $22 billion valuation. The funding round talks come alongside a public disclosure of the company's revenue trajectory: annualized revenue has crossed $2 billion, versus approximately $1 billion for Polymarket. The valuation climb tells the story of the year in compressed form: Kalshi was worth around $2 billion in June 2025, $11 billion by December, $22 billion in May 2026, and is now targeting $40 billion. The investors from the Series F — Coatue, Sequoia, Andreessen Horowitz, and Morgan Stanley — have seen their stake roughly double in value in under two months.
CEO Tarek Mansour confirmed to CNBC that the company is in early conversations about an eventual IPO but said emphatically that a public offering will not happen in 2026. Reports suggest late 2027 or 2028 as the realistic window, pending market conditions. The IPO discussion is itself a milestone: Kalshi's entire existence until this year was a regulatory fight to establish that its products were legal. That fight is not over — nine states are in active litigation — but the company is now simultaneously defending its right to operate in court and planning what a public offering might look like. Those two things coexist because the CFTC's legal posture strongly suggests the federal-preemption arguments will ultimately hold.
The combined Kalshi and Polymarket monthly trading volume for June was $44.8 billion, a 75% surge from May's $25.66 billion — driven overwhelmingly by World Cup trading. Kalshi claims more than 90% of US prediction market activity by volume. Institutional trading volume grew 800% in the six months ended June 2026. These are not the numbers of a niche product: they are approaching the scale of mid-tier US futures exchanges, which is precisely the comparison Kalshi wants analysts and potential IPO investors to make. The CFTC's proposed rule — open for public comment until July 27 — would formalize the regulatory regime that underpins all of it, converting the agency's litigation posture into codified regulation.
The $40 billion target is also a statement about competitive positioning. Polymarket reached $1 billion in annualized revenue six weeks after its US launch, which is extraordinary growth — but it is half of Kalshi's current figure. Bernstein analysts noted in a June 29 report that Kalshi owns the exchange stack and has built federally regulated infrastructure, but that it 'trails on distribution,' leaving it plausibly a target as well as an acquirer. The report named Robinhood, Coinbase, and DraftKings as potential acquirers. Mansour's IPO positioning is a direct response to that framing: a $40 billion public valuation makes a friendly acquisition harder to execute and establishes Kalshi as a standalone financial exchange rather than an asset to be absorbed into a larger consumer platform.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Crypto.com and Novig Sue Missouri as Market Leaders Hold Back — Eighth Circuit Now in Play via Iowa
Crypto.com and Novig filed federal lawsuits on October 16 challenging Missouri's cease-and-desist orders, arguing their sports event contracts fall under exclusive CFTC jurisdiction. The suits came as Missouri's 30-day compliance window closed. Notably, the market leaders — Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, and Underdog — have not sued; Missouri said it is in 'ongoing discussions' with Kalshi. The outcome is tied to the Eighth Circuit, which is now weighing the same preemption question in Kalshi's appeal of a preliminary injunction denial in Iowa — the fourth federal circuit to take up the prediction market question.
Ohio Escalates Post-Sixth Circuit — Cease-and-Desist to 10 Operators, but Platforms Keep Operating
Emboldened by its Sixth Circuit win, Ohio escalated enforcement against prediction markets. Governor Mike DeWine and the Ohio Casino Control Commission issued cease-and-desist letters dated October 2 to 10 operators, including Polymarket and Robinhood, with an October 16 compliance deadline and penalties up to the value gained from contracts. Kalshi was excluded because a court order already covers it. As of October 20, platforms were continuing to operate in Ohio despite the deadline passing. Polymarket has sued the Commission and Ohio AG Andy Wilson on Commerce Clause and CEA-preemption grounds; Wilson is expected to sue non-compliant operators.
Midterm Election Betting Tops $220M — Double the Entire 2024 Cycle — as Public Opposition Mounts
Traders have wagered more than $220 million on the 2026 congressional midterms across Kalshi and Polymarket, more than double the $92 million bet across the entire 2024 cycle, according to a Reuters analysis of Anti-Corruption Data Collective data published October 14. The 2026 cycle has more than 21,000 individual markets, up from 463 tracked in 2024. Volume is concentrated in a few races, led by the Texas Senate contest. The growth comes despite a Reuters/Ipsos poll finding that most Americans oppose using prediction markets to bet on elections, and amid continuing concern from election officials about integrity and insider trading.