Study Finds $143M in Polymarket Insider Trading; Kalshi Fines Candidates and Issues $2.2M Refund
A law school study flagged $143 million in suspected insider-trading profits on Polymarket over two years and over 200,000 suspicious trades. Separately, Kalshi fined three political candidates who bet on their own races and issued $2.2M in refunds after a disputed Khamenei market.
Two law professors published findings in late March 2026 documenting $143 million in suspected insider-trading profits on Polymarket between February 2024 and February 2026. Using publicly available on-chain blockchain data, the study flagged more than 200,000 individual bets with patterns consistent with non-public information: large positions placed in the minutes before news events became public and outsized sizing on markets that resolved in the trader's favor at long odds.
The methodology relied on Polymarket's own transparency. Every trade on the platform is recorded permanently on the Polygon blockchain and publicly visible, unlike traditional financial markets where reporting is delayed by days. The researchers found the same cluster of wallets repeatedly profiting immediately before major political and geopolitical announcements, a pattern they described as inconsistent with superior forecasting ability. They provided wallet address patterns to the CFTC. The same on-chain visibility Polymarket cites as a consumer protection feature is what made the pattern detectable from public data alone.
The CFTC's capacity to act on those referrals is under strain. The commission's workforce has fallen 24% since January 2025, the steepest proportional staffing cut in its modern history, at the same time that prediction market volume has surged into the billions of dollars annually. A pending CFTC reauthorization bill includes a provision to restore enforcement staffing but its passage is uncertain. The April 24 Van Dyke prosecution was brought by the Department of Justice rather than the CFTC, suggesting meaningful federal enforcement of prediction market insider trading is increasingly falling to DOJ rather than to the designated commodity regulator.
Kalshi has pursued self-enforcement in parallel. The platform fined three political candidates who traded on their own race outcomes: a Democratic primary candidate in Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District (fined $539.85), a Republican primary candidate in Texas's 21st Congressional District (fined $784.20), and a Democratic US Senate primary candidate in Virginia who refused to settle and was assessed $6,229.30 plus any trading gains. Kalshi also issued $2.2 million in refunds following a disputed market on Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's tenure in office, after Khamenei was killed at the start of a regional conflict, and now faces civil litigation over that settlement.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
CFTC Sues New Mexico — Eighth State in the Federal Preemption Fight, and the First Filed After the Proposed Rule Dropped
The CFTC sued New Mexico on June 12, 2026 to block the state from enforcing its gambling laws against prediction markets, days after AG Raúl Torrez sued Kalshi for offering unlicensed online sports betting. New Mexico is the eighth state the agency has sued. The complaint is the first to land after the CFTC's own proposed rule was released this week — a rule that explicitly supports most sports-related event contracts.
ProphetX Wins CFTC DCM and DCO Approval — the Sweepstakes-to-Prediction-Market Conversion Wave Begins
ProphetX, the former state-licensed sportsbook turned sweepstakes exchange, won CFTC approval this week for both a Designated Contract Market and a derivatives clearing organization, and will convert to a sports prediction market early next week. It is the first of an expected wave of sweepstakes operators — Novig and Sporttrade have applications pending — pivoting to federal regulation as states ban sweepstakes apps.
Google Bans Prediction-Market Ads in Ohio — Second State After Nevada, and Regulators Weren't Told First
Google updated its US prediction-markets advertising policy to prohibit ads for prediction-market contracts in Ohio, effective June 2, 2026. Ohio joins Nevada as the only states excluded since Google opened the category in January. The Ohio Casino Control Commission says it did not request the ban — adding a new, private-sector front to a fight that has so far run through courts and statehouses.