● Live Wisconsin AG suit vs Kalshi & Polymarket pending · NY/IL insider-trading orders in effect · Updated May 2026
← News & Updates
Regulation

Wisconsin AG Sues Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Crypto.com and Coinbase

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed suit in state court seeking permanent injunctions against all five major US prediction market platforms, arguing event contracts constitute unlicensed gambling under state law regardless of federal CFTC licensing.

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed suit in state court against Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Robinhood, and Coinbase in late April 2026, seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions barring the platforms from operating in Wisconsin. The filing is the broadest state-level legal challenge to prediction market operators in the industry's history, targeting every major US-accessible platform in a single action.

Kaul's complaint frames event contracts as unlicensed gambling under Wisconsin law, regardless of the federal CFTC Designated Contract Market licences held by some defendants. "Thinly disguising unlawful conduct doesn't make it lawful," Kaul said at the announcement. The theory forces a collision with federal pre-emption doctrine: Kalshi and Robinhood both hold DCM licences and have argued that federal CFTC oversight supersedes state gaming statutes. Courts have not resolved this pre-emption question definitively, and the Wisconsin case is expected to become a key test of whether state gaming authorities can override a federal commodity exchange licence.

For Wisconsin residents, even a preliminary injunction would block access to all five named platforms while litigation proceeds. The stakes are significant given Kalshi's current availability in 35+ US states and Robinhood's 26-million-strong user base. Kaul's office did not specify remedies for existing Wisconsin account holders. Legal observers noted that New Jersey has already maintained a de facto exclusion of CFTC-licensed event contract platforms through its own regulatory posture, suggesting Wisconsin is following a precedent rather than acting in isolation.

At least three other state attorneys general have signalled interest in similar suits following Wisconsin's filing. The action coincides with a 24% reduction in CFTC staffing since January 2025, a capacity cut critics say has created a regulatory vacuum that states are beginning to fill. If Wisconsin prevails on the pre-emption question, federal DCM licences would lose much of their value as a shield against state gaming laws, potentially dismantling the geographic access model under which US prediction market platforms currently operate.

Recent updates


CFTC Sues New Mexico — Eighth State in the Federal Preemption Fight, and the First Filed After the Proposed Rule Dropped

The CFTC sued New Mexico on June 12, 2026 to block the state from enforcing its gambling laws against prediction markets, days after AG Raúl Torrez sued Kalshi for offering unlicensed online sports betting. New Mexico is the eighth state the agency has sued. The complaint is the first to land after the CFTC's own proposed rule was released this week — a rule that explicitly supports most sports-related event contracts.

ProphetX Wins CFTC DCM and DCO Approval — the Sweepstakes-to-Prediction-Market Conversion Wave Begins

ProphetX, the former state-licensed sportsbook turned sweepstakes exchange, won CFTC approval this week for both a Designated Contract Market and a derivatives clearing organization, and will convert to a sports prediction market early next week. It is the first of an expected wave of sweepstakes operators — Novig and Sporttrade have applications pending — pivoting to federal regulation as states ban sweepstakes apps.

Google Bans Prediction-Market Ads in Ohio — Second State After Nevada, and Regulators Weren't Told First

Google updated its US prediction-markets advertising policy to prohibit ads for prediction-market contracts in Ohio, effective June 2, 2026. Ohio joins Nevada as the only states excluded since Google opened the category in January. The Ohio Casino Control Commission says it did not request the ban — adding a new, private-sector front to a fight that has so far run through courts and statehouses.