Spain Initiates Disciplinary Proceedings Against Polymarket and Kalshi; Third Country to Block in 10 Days
Spain's gaming regulator ordered ISPs to block Polymarket and Kalshi access on May 26, 2026, opening formal disciplinary proceedings against both platforms for offering unlicensed betting products. Spain joins India and Indonesia in a coordinated 10-day wave of international blocking actions.
Spain's General Directorate for the Regulation of Gambling (DGOJ) initiated formal disciplinary proceedings against Polymarket and Kalshi on May 26, 2026 and ordered Spanish internet service providers to block access to both platforms. Spain classifies event-contract trading as unlicensed online betting under its 2011 Gaming Act, which requires a national license for any operator offering gambling products to Spanish residents. Neither Polymarket nor Kalshi holds the required license; Spanish regulators argue this makes both platforms criminal-law violators regardless of their US regulatory status.
Spain is the third country in ten days to take blocking action. India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology blocked Polymarket on May 22 under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025, and signaled that a Kalshi order would follow. Indonesia issued a parallel blocking order earlier in the same week. The three jurisdictions are unrelated in legal framework but converging on the same policy outcome: classify event contracts as gambling, deny exemption for foreign regulatory licenses, and use ISP-level blocking as the enforcement tool. None of the three offered the platforms a path to compliance through local licensing.
The international containment trajectory matters because Polymarket and Kalshi have been positioning themselves as globally accessible derivatives venues. Polymarket's international platform (the original, separate from the QCEX-licensed US product) drove most of the company's growth through 2025 and into 2026. India was the fastest-growing international market last year. Spain is smaller in absolute terms but symbolically significant as the first EU member state to formally block; the question is whether other EU regulators (BaFin in Germany, AMF in France, CySEC in Cyprus) follow the Spanish framework. None has formally moved yet. EU members generally coordinate on financial-services regulation through ESMA, but gambling regulation is explicitly carved out as a member-state competence, which is why Spain can act unilaterally without triggering EU-level proceedings.
For the platforms the operational response is constrained. ISP-level blocking can be circumvented through VPN use, and prior data from comparable jurisdictions suggests 60 to 80 percent of motivated users find workarounds within weeks. The deeper damage is to institutional credibility and to compliance frameworks the platforms need for US relaunch under QCEX. A CFTC-licensed exchange that is simultaneously being blocked as illegal gambling in three sovereign jurisdictions has a harder story to tell to US prudential regulators, to potential institutional investors, and (most importantly) to the federal courts now deciding the US state preemption cases. The international actions create a narrative that prediction-market platforms are operating in regulatory gray areas everywhere except where US federal law has unambiguously protected them, which is exactly the framing state attorneys general have been pushing in court.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanor, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing of suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinizing oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures attempting to trade 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual and somewhat conflicting role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog, at a time when the agency has shed enforcement staff.