Spain Initiates Disciplinary Proceedings Against Polymarket and Kalshi; Third Country to Block in 10 Days
Spain's gaming regulator ordered ISPs to block Polymarket and Kalshi access on May 26, 2026, opening formal disciplinary proceedings against both platforms for offering unlicensed betting products. Spain joins India and Indonesia in a coordinated 10-day wave of international blocking actions.
Spain's General Directorate for the Regulation of Gambling (DGOJ) initiated formal disciplinary proceedings against Polymarket and Kalshi on May 26, 2026 and ordered Spanish internet service providers to block access to both platforms. Spain classifies event-contract trading as unlicensed online betting under its 2011 Gaming Act, which requires a national license for any operator offering gambling products to Spanish residents. Neither Polymarket nor Kalshi holds the required license; Spanish regulators argue this makes both platforms criminal-law violators regardless of their US regulatory status.
Spain is the third country in ten days to take blocking action. India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology blocked Polymarket on May 22 under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025, and signaled that a Kalshi order would follow. Indonesia issued a parallel blocking order earlier in the same week. The three jurisdictions are unrelated in legal framework but converging on the same policy outcome: classify event contracts as gambling, deny exemption for foreign regulatory licenses, and use ISP-level blocking as the enforcement tool. None of the three offered the platforms a path to compliance through local licensing.
The international containment trajectory matters because Polymarket and Kalshi have been positioning themselves as globally accessible derivatives venues. Polymarket's international platform (the original, separate from the QCEX-licensed US product) drove most of the company's growth through 2025 and into 2026. India was the fastest-growing international market last year. Spain is smaller in absolute terms but symbolically significant as the first EU member state to formally block; the question is whether other EU regulators (BaFin in Germany, AMF in France, CySEC in Cyprus) follow the Spanish framework. None has formally moved yet. EU members generally coordinate on financial-services regulation through ESMA, but gambling regulation is explicitly carved out as a member-state competence, which is why Spain can act unilaterally without triggering EU-level proceedings.
For the platforms the operational response is constrained. ISP-level blocking can be circumvented through VPN use, and prior data from comparable jurisdictions suggests 60 to 80 percent of motivated users find workarounds within weeks. The deeper damage is to institutional credibility and to compliance frameworks the platforms need for US relaunch under QCEX. A CFTC-licensed exchange that is simultaneously being blocked as illegal gambling in three sovereign jurisdictions has a harder story to tell to US prudential regulators, to potential institutional investors, and (most importantly) to the federal courts now deciding the US state preemption cases. The international actions create a narrative that prediction-market platforms are operating in regulatory gray areas everywhere except where US federal law has unambiguously protected them, which is exactly the framing state attorneys general have been pushing in court.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.