Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanor, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, CEO Tarek Mansour and president Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28, 2026. According to reporting, the charges comprise 13 felonies and one misdemeanor, including a second-degree felony count of engaging in a 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The case stems from a September sting operation in which an undercover state agent placed 12 sports wagers on Kalshi, and the platform's own location-verification system confirmed that the agent was physically in Utah — establishing, in the state's view, that Kalshi knowingly accepted sports wagers from a Utah user in violation of state gambling law. Kalshi called the charges a 'crazy overreach' and accused Utah of playing politics.
Utah is the second state to bring criminal charges against Kalshi, after Arizona filed misdemeanor counts in March 2026. But Utah's action is a significant escalation beyond Arizona's in two respects. First, the charges are predominantly felonies rather than misdemeanors, including the serious 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count that Utah uses for organized or repeated criminal conduct. Second, and more consequentially, Utah charged the two co-founders personally. Naming Mansour and Lopes Lara as individual defendants transforms the legal exposure from a corporate regulatory matter into a personal criminal matter for the company's leadership. Individual criminal liability for executives is a dramatically higher-stakes form of enforcement than corporate fines or injunctions, and it is the kind of action that can affect executives' ability to travel, their personal legal exposure, and the company's governance — regardless of how the underlying preemption question is ultimately resolved.
The criminal charges arrived one day after the CFTC sued Utah to block the state's enforcement, making Utah the tenth state the agency has taken to court to defend the platforms' federal jurisdiction. The sequence — CFTC sues the state to assert federal preemption, state responds by filing criminal charges anyway — illustrates how far the confrontation has escalated in the states most determined to enforce. The legal backdrop in Utah is unfavorable to Kalshi: a federal court in the Tenth Circuit ruled in August that federal commodities law did not preempt Utah's authority over Kalshi's sports contracts, and Kalshi is appealing that ruling. With an adverse ruling on the preemption question already in hand, Utah is proceeding on the theory that its gambling laws apply and that Kalshi's continued operation is therefore criminal. The CFTC's suit asserts the opposite — that federal law preempts Utah entirely — setting up a direct federal-versus-state confrontation over whether a state can criminally prosecute conduct that a federal agency says is federally authorized.
The personal charges against the founders raise the stakes for the entire sector. Until now, the state enforcement campaign has operated primarily through civil mechanisms: cease-and-desist letters, injunctions, civil suits, and corporate penalties. Criminal charges against named executives introduce a form of personal jeopardy that changes the risk calculus for every platform operator. If Utah's charges proceed and survive the preemption defense, other states with criminal gambling statutes could follow the same path, and prediction market executives could face personal criminal exposure across multiple jurisdictions. The CFTC's defense of the platforms does not shield individuals from state criminal liability unless and until a court rules that federal preemption bars the prosecution — which is precisely the question that is unresolved and now before the Supreme Court. For Kalshi's founders, the Utah charges mean that the abstract preemption question pending at SCOTUS now has concrete personal consequences, and that the outcome of the federal-versus-state fight will determine not only whether their company can operate but whether they personally face felony convictions.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing of suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinizing oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures attempting to trade 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual and somewhat conflicting role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog, at a time when the agency has shed enforcement staff.
Pentagon Bars Personnel From Trading on Military Information After $400K Prediction Market Scandal
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued an October 20 memo barring Department of Defense personnel from making financial transactions using non-public information, explicitly naming Polymarket and Kalshi. The directive follows the prosecution of a Special Forces soldier accused of making more than $400,000 on Polymarket by betting on a mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Hegseth's rationale is a national-security concern: a bet on a military outcome creates a market signal that adversaries can read. 'Our enemies watch movements in these markets,' the memo states.