An Independent Integrity Body Found 7 Betting Irregularities at the World Cup. FIFA Said There Were None. The Clash Centres on Polymarket.
The Group of Copenhagen — the Council of Europe's independent match manipulation watchdog — raised seven yellow notices for potential betting irregularities during the 2026 World Cup, directly contradicting FIFA's all-clear published on Tuesday. The most troubling finding involves Polymarket: the platform opened a market on 2 July asking whether Folarin Balogun would play against Belgium — the same day Balogun received a red card, three days before FIFA publicly confirmed his ban was suspended. No equivalent markets were opened for any of the other 14 red cards at the tournament.
The Group of Copenhagen, the Council of Europe's independent match integrity watchdog operating under the Macolin Convention, raised seven yellow-category notices for potential betting irregularities across the 2026 World Cup's 104 matches. The findings, summarised Wednesday by the Council of Europe, directly contradict FIFA's own Integrity Task Force, which published an all-clear on Tuesday stating it had found 'no suspicious betting activity or indications of match manipulation in connection with any fixture.' The clash between a FIFA-affiliated body and an independent one is the sharpest integrity dispute to emerge from any World Cup in recent history.
The most substantive individual finding involves Polymarket. The platform opened a market on 2 July asking 'Will Folarin Balogun play against Belgium?' — the same day the American striker received a red card against Bosnia and Herzegovina. Under normal FIFA rules, a red card triggers an automatic one-match suspension. FIFA's Disciplinary Committee only confirmed Balogun's ban had been suspended — making him eligible — on 5 July, three days later. The report notes that no comparable market was opened for any of the other 14 players shown red cards during the tournament. Polymarket opened that one market, on that one player, on the day of the incident, before the ruling was public. The Group of Copenhagen has sent an official written request to FIFA for an explanation.
A second prediction-market finding involves a $4.8 million position on Polymarket backing Spain not to defeat Cape Verde in a group stage match — a game that ended 0-0. Spain were heavy favourites. Gambling industry expert Christian Kalb cautioned against reading too much into it: 'If you are a traditional bookmaker, there will be matches when everyone bets on a very strong favourite to win. They could use a prediction market like Polymarket to hedge that risk.' Yellow notices per the Group's framework can reflect many things — unexplained odds movements, rumours, or legitimate hedging. They do not indicate confirmed manipulation.
The Group of Copenhagen's operation was the first time any international integrity body has continuously monitored prediction markets — Polymarket and Kalshi (an official FIFA partner) — at a major tournament. Its report states that prediction markets 'raise unprecedented issues: they allow betting on a very wide range of events, often anonymously and using payment methods that are difficult to trace.' The $240 billion in total bets across the tournament — roughly twice the 2022 Qatar figure — reflects how quickly prediction market volume has scaled the integrity challenge. For UK readers, the Macolin Convention is a Council of Europe treaty to which the UK is a signatory; the Group of Copenhagen's work feeds directly into the regulatory frameworks that inform the Gambling Commission's approach to new betting products.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanour, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinising oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures trading 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog.