● Live Wisconsin AG suit vs Kalshi & Polymarket pending · NY/IL insider-trading orders in effect · Updated May 2026
← News & Updates
Regulation

The CFTC Told Kalshi to Defy a State Court Order — and Kalshi Is Caught in the Middle

Michigan's Judge Aquilina extended Kalshi's sports-contract ban through August 12 on July 13, raising the daily fine to $500,000. The next day, CFTC Chairman Selig used the agency's emergency authority under the Commodity Exchange Act to order Kalshi to continue honoring Michigan trades — directly contradicting the state court's order. Kalshi is now caught between two conflicting legal mandates with no clear path to comply with both.

Michigan's Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina extended Kalshi's sports-contract ban on July 13, 2026, the day the original temporary restraining order was due to expire after its June 29 issuance. Rather than let it lapse, Aquilina gave Kalshi 30 days — until August 12 — to implement proper geofencing to block Michigan users from its sports event contracts, or face a daily fine raised from $120,000 to $500,000. The 30-day window was twice what the Michigan Attorney General had requested. GeoComply, the geolocation vendor Kalshi had just engaged, testified that geofencing typically takes one to two weeks to implement — but that Kalshi had only been working with GeoComply for three to four days at the time and could not give the court a compliance timeline.

The day after, the CFTC escalated. On July 14, CFTC Chairman Michael Selig invoked the agency's emergency authority under the Commodity Exchange Act and issued a direct order to Kalshi: honor all open event-contract trades by Michigan users, regardless of what the state court has ordered. The basis was that a state court cannot compel a federally designated contract market to cancel validly executed trades, and that canceling those trades would undermine the certainty of contract that all derivatives markets depend on. Selig said: 'A state cannot force a DCM to violate its obligations, and federal law does not permit a DCM to discriminate against a state's residents.' Better Markets, the financial regulation advocacy group, called the CFTC's action 'lawless' and accused the agency of directing a regulated entity to defy a court order.

The result is a direct collision between two legal mandates. The Ingham County court's extended restraining order says Kalshi must stop Michigan users from trading sports event contracts and geofence the state by August 12 or pay $500,000 per day. The CFTC's emergency order says Kalshi must honor those trades. Compliance with one order means contempt of the other. Kalshi said it was reviewing the CFTC's order and considering its next steps. The company is caught between a state judge who can fine it $500,000 per day and a federal agency that can revoke its exchange license — and the two are giving it opposite instructions.

The constitutional structure of this conflict is unprecedented. The CFTC and a state court have now issued formally incompatible orders to the same entity about the same trades. This is the direct consequence of the CFTC having failed to obtain a preliminary injunction in Michigan federal court in June, when Judge Paul Maloney denied Polymarket and Robinhood's motion and ruled that sports event contracts are likely not swaps under federal law. The CFTC is now attempting through executive emergency action what it could not obtain through litigation. Whether the agency's emergency authority under the CEA can override a state court's contempt power has no clear precedent — and that question is almost certainly heading to a federal appellate court before August 12.

Operators mentioned in this article


Recent updates


Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US

Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.

Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint

Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.

Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition

Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.