Fed Hikes 25bp for First Time Since 2023 — Prediction Markets Priced It at 81% vs CME Futures at 64%
The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate 25 basis points to 3.75%-4% on September 16 — the first increase since 2023 — in a 12-0 unanimous vote. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation remains too high, driven in part by energy prices. The dot plot showed 16 of 18 officials expect at least one more hike before year-end. Prediction markets on Kalshi priced the September hike at 81% going into the decision; CME fed funds futures implied a 64% probability. The gap reinforces a recurring pattern in 2026: prediction markets have consistently assigned higher probabilities to rate hikes than CME futures, and have been correct.
The Federal Open Market Committee voted 12-0 on September 16 to raise the federal funds rate target by 25 basis points to 3.75%-4.00%, the first rate increase since the Fed's 2023 tightening cycle ended. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, delivering the post-meeting press conference, said inflation 'remains elevated' and attributed persistent price pressures in part to high energy costs. The updated Summary of Economic Projections — the dot plot — showed that 16 of 18 FOMC participants expected at least one additional hike at either the November or December 2026 meetings, with four officials projecting two more increases before year-end. Markets priced further tightening immediately: two-year Treasury yields rose sharply, the dollar strengthened, and both equity and credit markets fell on the more hawkish-than-anticipated dot plot.
Kalshi's prediction market on the September FOMC outcome had priced the 25bp hike at 81% going into the meeting. CME Group's FedWatch tool, derived from fed funds futures pricing, implied a 64% probability of the same outcome at the same time. The 17-percentage-point gap is not unique to this meeting: Kalshi has consistently priced higher probabilities of rate hikes than CME futures throughout 2026. In July, when CME implied roughly 26% probability of a September hike, Kalshi showed approximately 47%. By September 14, the day before the decision, Kalshi was at 81% and CME at 64%. The gap narrowed over time as the decision approached, but Kalshi maintained a persistently higher hike probability throughout the forecasting window — and proved more accurate. Academic research on prediction markets versus futures-implied probabilities has generally found that prediction markets aggregate information differently and can lead futures pricing on rate decisions by days or weeks.
The mechanics behind the divergence are debated. One explanation is that CME fed funds futures are used extensively for hedging, which introduces a risk premium that biases the implied probability away from pure expectation — a trader who wants to hedge against a hike will buy contracts that increase in value if rates rise, pushing the futures price toward pricing a higher rate probability even if the trader does not personally believe a hike is more likely than not. Prediction markets, by contrast, are closer to pure probability contracts with no physical delivery or hedging demand, which means the price should more directly reflect participants' collective probability estimate. Whether the Kalshi market's structural cleanliness or its participant base's informational advantage drove the September gap is not determinable from the price alone, but the outcome validates the higher Kalshi probability over the CME futures signal on this particular call.
The Fed hike's broader implications are relevant to prediction markets beyond the forecasting validation. Higher rates increase the cost of capital for early-stage companies, which matters for Kalshi and Polymarket US as private companies with ongoing fundraising needs and expansion plans. A second hike before year-end — which the dot plot suggests is likely — would further tighten financial conditions. On the other hand, a higher-rate environment historically generates more trading interest in rate-sensitive financial products, and Kalshi's economic and Fed-decision markets have been among its highest-volume non-sports categories. The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for October 28-29, 2026, which falls during the NFL regular season's peak and one week before the November 3 congressional midterm elections — a date that will concentrate prediction market volume in Fed, political, and sports categories simultaneously.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Missouri AG Sends Cease-and-Desist Letters to Six Prediction Market Operators
Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway issued cease-and-desist letters on September 18 to six prediction market operators — Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Crypto.com, Novig, and Underdog — alleging their sports event contracts constitute unlicensed sports wagering under Missouri law. The letters give platforms 30 days to comply or obtain licenses from the Missouri Gaming Commission. Missouri is the broadest multi-platform C&D action to date, targeting all major operators simultaneously. The action arrives one day after Montana and Kalshi filed a joint stipulation in which Montana agreed to pause enforcement while Ninth Circuit en banc review is pending.
Yahoo Finance Ends Polymarket Data Partnership After Five Months
Yahoo Finance and Polymarket mutually ended their prediction market data partnership on September 18, approximately five months after the companies announced an exclusive arrangement in November 2025. The Polymarket data hub that Yahoo Finance launched in January-February 2026 was quietly taken down in April 2026. No reason was publicly disclosed. Yahoo Finance retains an advertising relationship with Polymarket. The partnership's end is a setback for Polymarket's strategy of embedding its probability data into mainstream financial media platforms.
Montana and Kalshi Reach Joint Stipulation — State Pauses Enforcement Pending Ninth Circuit En Banc
Kalshi dismissed its lawsuit against the Montana Department of Justice on September 17 after both sides filed a joint stipulation in which Montana agreed to pause all enforcement, investigations, and cease-and-desist proceedings against Kalshi's event contracts. The pause lasts until the Ninth Circuit either denies en banc review of the August 28 ruling or issues an en banc decision. Montana must give Kalshi 30 days written notice before resuming any enforcement action after that window closes. The agreement mirrors the Robinhood-Michigan stipulation from September 4 and reinforces a pattern of states reaching negotiated compliance pauses while the appellate process plays out.