Congress Is Holding a Hearing on Whether Prediction Markets Are Sports Bets — With No Prediction Market Companies in the Room
The House Agriculture Committee will hold a hearing on Tuesday July 22 on the status of sports event contracts, featuring the American Gaming Association, tribal gaming interests, and former CFTC attorneys — but no representatives from Kalshi, Polymarket, or any other prediction market platform. The AGA will argue that sports event contracts are sports bets. Former CFTC counsel will defend the agency's authority. The hearing comes as the World Cup winner market on Kalshi hit a record $1.9 billion in total volume — more than double this year's Super Bowl.
The House Agriculture Committee will hold a hearing on Tuesday July 22 examining whether sports event contracts on prediction markets should be regulated as sports bets — or whether the CFTC's authority over them as federally-designated financial instruments should stand. The witness list is notable for who is there and who is not. Testifying are Chris Cylke of the American Gaming Association, David Bean of the Indian Gaming Association, Solidus Labs CEO Asaf Meir, and two former CFTC attorneys in private practice. Kalshi, Polymarket, or any representative of the prediction market industry will not be in the room.
Cylke's written testimony, seen by Barron's ahead of the hearing, argues that sports event contracts are sports bets and should be regulated as such. The AGA made the same argument at a Senate hearing in May, pointing to two compounding concerns: prediction markets are not required to offer responsible gambling tools — including self-exclusion for customers who want to cut themselves off — that licensed sportsbooks must provide; and they do not generate state tax revenue. David Bean of the Indian Gaming Association will raise a third line of objection: that federally-supervised prediction market contracts may intrude on tribal sovereignty in states where Native American groups have been awarded exclusive sports-betting rights, as in Florida.
Solidus Labs CEO Asaf Meir pushed back on the integrity-monitoring argument in an interview with Barron's ahead of his testimony. Solidus provides surveillance systems to prediction market platforms, including Kalshi. Meir said that in the second quarter of 2026 alone, Solidus surfaced 120,000 alerts to one of its clients, of which 400 became active investigations and two dozen were referred to the CFTC for enforcement. He argued the monitoring infrastructure on prediction markets is 'superior' to what sportsbooks operate, because it combines otherwise siloed data feeds across exchange activity in ways that traditional sportsbook surveillance cannot. Two former CFTC attorneys — former general counsel Robert Schwartz and Carl Kennedy, who was special counsel during the drafting of the 2010 Dodd-Frank swaps provisions — will defend both the agency's legal authority over event contracts and its operational capacity to regulate them.
The hearing arrives at an odd moment for the industry. Kalshi's World Cup winner market generated $1.9 billion in total trading volume by the tournament's conclusion — a record for any single prediction market contract on a US exchange, and more than double the volume of this year's Super Bowl. Kalshi added three million new users over the course of the month. Those numbers make the AGA's framing harder to dismiss as a narrow regulatory argument: what is now a $1.9 billion single-contract market, conducted on a federally licensed exchange under CFTC supervision, sits in direct competition with the sportsbooks the AGA represents. The legal question — are sports event contracts swaps or sports bets — is slowly working through courts toward the Supreme Court. The congressional question running in parallel is simpler: who has the political standing to define what these products are, and who profits from the answer.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanor, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing of suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinizing oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures attempting to trade 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual and somewhat conflicting role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog, at a time when the agency has shed enforcement staff.