Congress Is Holding a Hearing on Whether Prediction Markets Are Sports Bets — With No Prediction Market Companies in the Room
The House Agriculture Committee will hold a hearing on Tuesday July 22 on the status of sports event contracts, featuring the American Gaming Association, tribal gaming interests, and former CFTC attorneys — but no representatives from Kalshi, Polymarket, or any other prediction market platform. The AGA will argue that sports event contracts are sports bets. Former CFTC counsel will defend the agency's authority. The hearing comes as the World Cup winner market on Kalshi hit a record $1.9 billion in total volume — more than double this year's Super Bowl.
The House Agriculture Committee will hold a hearing on Tuesday July 22 examining whether sports event contracts on prediction markets should be regulated as sports bets — or whether the CFTC's authority over them as federally-designated financial instruments should stand. The witness list is notable for who is there and who is not. Testifying are Chris Cylke of the American Gaming Association, David Bean of the Indian Gaming Association, Solidus Labs CEO Asaf Meir, and two former CFTC attorneys in private practice. Kalshi, Polymarket, or any representative of the prediction market industry will not be in the room.
Cylke's written testimony, seen by Barron's ahead of the hearing, argues that sports event contracts are sports bets and should be regulated as such. The AGA made the same argument at a Senate hearing in May, pointing to two compounding concerns: prediction markets are not required to offer responsible gambling tools — including self-exclusion for customers who want to cut themselves off — that licensed sportsbooks must provide; and they do not generate state tax revenue. David Bean of the Indian Gaming Association will raise a third line of objection: that federally-supervised prediction market contracts may intrude on tribal sovereignty in states where Native American groups have been awarded exclusive sports-betting rights, as in Florida.
Solidus Labs CEO Asaf Meir pushed back on the integrity-monitoring argument in an interview with Barron's ahead of his testimony. Solidus provides surveillance systems to prediction market platforms, including Kalshi. Meir said that in the second quarter of 2026 alone, Solidus surfaced 120,000 alerts to one of its clients, of which 400 became active investigations and two dozen were referred to the CFTC for enforcement. He argued the monitoring infrastructure on prediction markets is 'superior' to what sportsbooks operate, because it combines otherwise siloed data feeds across exchange activity in ways that traditional sportsbook surveillance cannot. Two former CFTC attorneys — former general counsel Robert Schwartz and Carl Kennedy, who was special counsel during the drafting of the 2010 Dodd-Frank swaps provisions — will defend both the agency's legal authority over event contracts and its operational capacity to regulate them.
The hearing arrives at an odd moment for the industry. Kalshi's World Cup winner market generated $1.9 billion in total trading volume by the tournament's conclusion — a record for any single prediction market contract on a US exchange, and more than double the volume of this year's Super Bowl. Kalshi added three million new users over the course of the month. Those numbers make the AGA's framing harder to dismiss as a narrow regulatory argument: what is now a $1.9 billion single-contract market, conducted on a federally licensed exchange under CFTC supervision, sits in direct competition with the sportsbooks the AGA represents. The legal question — are sports event contracts swaps or sports bets — is slowly working through courts toward the Supreme Court. The congressional question running in parallel is simpler: who has the political standing to define what these products are, and who profits from the answer.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.