Bloomberg Found $200 Million in Suspicious Wagers on Kalshi and Polymarket. An Army Sergeant Has Already Been Indicted.
A Bloomberg investigation identified approximately $200 million in wagers on Kalshi and Polymarket between January and June 2026 displaying characteristics associated with potential insider trading — concentrated in geopolitical event markets. A federal indictment unsealed in April charged US Army Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke with using classified information about Operation Absolute Resolve, the operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, to generate $409,000 in profit. 57% of wallets with unusually successful returns were created within 24 hours of placing bets. The House Oversight Committee has launched a formal investigation.
A Bloomberg investigation published July 20 identified approximately $200 million in wagers on Kalshi and Polymarket between January and June 2026 that displayed characteristics associated with potential insider trading, with geopolitical event markets — including those covering tensions with Iran and political developments in Venezuela — accounting for a significant portion of the suspicious activity. The most striking detail in the dataset: 57% of wallets with unusually successful returns were created within 24 hours before placing the bets that generated those returns. Fresh accounts, consistently profitable, on markets tied to events that subsequently occurred — a pattern that analysts say is difficult to explain without access to non-public information.
The investigation has already produced a federal criminal case. A grand jury indictment unsealed on April 24, 2026, charges US Army Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke with using classified intelligence about Operation Absolute Resolve — the operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro — to place wagers that generated more than $409,000 in profit. Van Dyke had access to mission-critical intelligence ahead of the operation and is alleged to have converted that foreknowledge into prediction market positions before the news was public. The case is the first federal criminal prosecution of a prediction market participant for insider trading and establishes that the conduct can be prosecuted under existing law — even though prediction markets did not exist when the insider trading statutes were written.
Both platforms say they have implemented screening measures. Kalshi now collects employment data from users in certain markets to identify prohibited participants, bars politicians from wagering on their own campaigns, and bars athletes from betting on markets tied to their own sports. But Bloomberg found that new evasion techniques are emerging faster than the platforms can counter them — fresh wallets, proxy accounts, and structuring bets across multiple accounts to stay below detection thresholds. The House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, launched a formal investigation into insider trading on prediction market platforms following the Bloomberg report. The investigation follows directly from the House Agriculture Committee hearing on July 22, where integrity monitoring was a central issue, and from the Group of Copenhagen's report on the same day flagging the Polymarket market on Folarin Balogun's availability — which was opened before FIFA publicly confirmed his suspension had been lifted.
The insider trading problem is structurally different from the state-versus-federal regulatory dispute over sports event contracts. A state attorney general suing over sports gambling enforcement is a known quantity: courts can apply existing law, platforms can geofence, and the CFTC can preempt or not. Insider trading on geopolitical prediction markets is harder to contain. The markets that attracted the most suspicious activity are precisely the ones that generate the clearest information signal — which candidate will win, which operation will succeed, which policy will change — because they involve participants who may have access to information that markets cannot price. Whether prediction markets can solve that problem with technology, or whether regulators need to impose new rules, is now an open question at both the Justice Department and on Capitol Hill.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.