India Blocks Polymarket Under New Online Gaming Act; Kalshi Order Reportedly Imminent
India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has ordered ISPs to cut access to Polymarket, classifying event contracts as "online money gaming" under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025. A similar order targeting Kalshi is reportedly being prepared.
India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has issued a blocking order directing Indian internet service providers to cut access to Polymarket, and local media reports cite an anonymous MeitY source saying a parallel order for Kalshi could be issued as soon as this Friday. Polymarket is currently inaccessible to Indian users; Kalshi remains reachable as of publication. The action is the first major sovereign blocking of CFTC-regulated event-contract platforms outside the United States and represents a substantively different regulatory model from the state-level felony statute Minnesota signed earlier this week.
India's legal hook is the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025, which carves the online-gaming space into three categories: e-sports, social gaming, and "online money gaming." The last category is prohibited entirely, and MeitY has classified prediction-market activity as falling squarely inside it. The blocking order appears to flow from an April 25, 2026 MeitY advisory to VPN providers and consumer-internet platforms warning against facilitating access to prohibited gaming services. The Act's text gives MeitY broad executive authority to direct ISP-level blocks without requiring case-by-case judicial review, which is why the Polymarket block could be imposed quickly and why the Kalshi order can follow on a comparable timeline.
The Indian regulatory posture is not isolated. India already applies a 30% capital-gains rate on crypto-asset disposals and a 1% TDS (tax deducted at source) on every crypto transaction, an effective shadow-ban that has hollowed out domestic crypto trading volume since 2022. The same regulatory instinct (strict capital controls plus restrictive interpretation of digital-asset and gaming statutes) drives the prediction-market block. From Polymarket's perspective the loss is meaningful: India was one of the platform's fastest-growing international markets through 2025, and the QCEX-licensed US relaunch was supposed to compensate for any future international constraint, not for a constraint imposed at exactly the same time as the US ramp-up.
Neither Polymarket nor Kalshi has issued a public statement on the India action. Both companies have legal counsel reviewing whether the blocking order can be challenged in Indian court on administrative-law or constitutional grounds, but the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025 is a recent, broadly written statute that the Indian government has shown willingness to enforce aggressively. The more realistic short-term path is engagement with MeitY on a possible exemption framework for CFTC-licensed exchanges, modeled on India's existing carve-outs for licensed brokerage of foreign securities. That path requires the platforms to argue that event contracts are commodity derivatives (a financial instrument) rather than gambling, which is the same argument they are making against US state attorneys general but with the burden of proof reversed under Indian administrative law.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.