After Yesterday's Hearing, Congress Looks Ready to Legislate on Prediction Markets — Not Just Watch
The House Agriculture Subcommittee held a two-hour hearing on July 22 examining sports event contracts, with witnesses from the American Gaming Association, tribal gaming, and both sides of the CFTC authority debate. Subcommittee Chair Dusty Johnson said Congress 'cannot afford to be silent' and signaled there is 'work for them to do.' Witnesses urged members to advance H.R. 7840, the Event Contract Enforcement Act, which would ban sports event contracts outright. The hearing adds a third front to a fight that is already being waged simultaneously in ten state courts and at the CFTC.
The House Agriculture Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development held a two-hour hearing on July 22 titled 'Examining Customer Protections and Market Integrity in Sports Event Prediction Markets.' The session was more hostile to prediction markets than the May Senate hearing that preceded it. Subcommittee Chair Dusty Johnson (R-SD) opened by saying it is 'abundantly clear that Congress cannot afford to be silent' on the issue, and closed by saying there is 'work for them to do' — the clearest signal yet from a committee chairman with jurisdiction over the CFTC that congressional action on prediction markets is now likely, not hypothetical.
The hearing heard testimony for H.R. 7840, the Event Contract Enforcement Act, which would prohibit sports event contracts on prediction market platforms nationwide — a statutory ban that would resolve the CFTC-versus-states question by simply removing the product category from federal permissibility. Rep. Jill Tokuda (D-HI) was the session's most direct voice: 'This is gambling. It's gambling.' Tokuda noted that prediction markets have been actively marketed as gambling by the operators themselves — a factual point that sits in tension with the legal argument that event contracts are financial instruments, not wagers. She also observed that the current federal structure effectively makes sports-outcome speculation available to any American over 18, in all 50 states, irrespective of whether their state has legalized sports betting. Eleven states have not.
Pro-prediction-market witnesses — led by former CFTC attorneys Robert Schwartz and Carl Kennedy — argued that the CFTC already possesses the statutory authority to regulate sports event contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act, and that new legislation is neither necessary nor desirable while courts are still working through the preemption questions. Solidus Labs CEO Asaf Meir defended the integrity-monitoring infrastructure in place on prediction market platforms, countering the AGA's argument that unlicensed prediction markets create the same sports corruption risks as sportsbooks without the same oversight. The absence of any representative from Kalshi, Polymarket, or any other prediction market platform at the witness table was noted: the industry's legal representatives spoke, but the industry itself did not appear.
The hearing adds a third active front to a fight that is already being waged simultaneously in ten state courts and through the CFTC's own proposed rulemaking — whose public comment window closes July 27. The practical significance of the congressional front is that legislation supersedes both. If H.R. 7840 or a similar bill were to pass, it would moot the CFTC's proposed rule and resolve all ten state lawsuits in the states' favor by removing the federal basis for prediction market sports contracts entirely. That outcome is not imminent — the Republican majority on the Agriculture Committee has been more sympathetic to CFTC authority than Democrats, and Chair Johnson stopped short of endorsing any specific bill. But the session made clear that the prediction markets sector now has to manage a congressional timeline as well as a judicial one.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Utah Files Felony Charges Against Kalshi and Its Founders — Second State to Criminally Charge a Platform
Utah filed criminal charges against Kalshi and its two co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, on October 28 — 13 felonies and a misdemeanor, including a second-degree 'pattern of unlawful criminal activity' count and 12 counts of online gambling promotion. The charges stem from a September sting in which an undercover agent placed 12 sports wagers verified to be in Utah. The CFTC sued Utah the day before to block state enforcement, its tenth such suit. Utah is the second state after Arizona to criminally charge Kalshi, and the first to charge the founders personally. Kalshi called it a 'crazy overreach.'
NBA Names Kalshi and Polymarket Preferred Exchanges — Leaving the NFL Alone in Opposition
The NBA announced on October 26 that it has named Kalshi and Polymarket its 'preferred prediction market exchanges,' signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the CFTC on basketball integrity, and expanded its DraftKings deal to include prediction markets — the first league to extend a sportsbook partnership into the category. The exchange deals bar league and team personnel from trading NBA contracts, limit permissible markets, and require sharing of suspicious-trading data, in exchange for NBA intellectual property and official data. The NBA joins MLB, the NHL, and MLS as partnered leagues, leaving the NFL as the lone major holdout — and the only league fighting the platforms in court.
CFTC Chair Says Agency Is Watching Prediction Markets for Manipulation Ahead of Midterms
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on October 23 that the agency is closely monitoring prediction markets for manipulation ahead of the November 3 midterms, and that it is separately scrutinizing oil market trading tied to President Trump's announcements about the war in Iran. Combined midterm open interest on Kalshi and Polymarket stood at $250 million as of October 18, with Kalshi holding 84%. Selig acknowledged the agency often catches political figures attempting to trade 'oftentimes after the fact.' The remarks highlight the CFTC's dual and somewhat conflicting role as both the platforms' federal protector and their manipulation watchdog, at a time when the agency has shed enforcement staff.