Kalshi Settles Nevada Contempt Case — Agrees to GeoComply Geofencing as Hearing Is Canceled
Kalshi and the Nevada Gaming Control Board have reached a settlement agreement ending the state's contempt proceedings against the prediction market platform. Under the deal, Kalshi must implement a GeoComply-powered multi-source geofencing system to block Nevada residents from accessing its sports, election, and entertainment markets by August 12 — or pay $120,000 per day. The contempt hearing scheduled for July had been triggered by evidence that NGCB investigators successfully purchased prohibited contracts on Kalshi's platform eight times in four days while physically inside Nevada.
The Nevada Gaming Control Board and Kalshi have agreed to a joint settlement that cancels the state's contempt proceedings against the prediction market platform. The deal, announced July 24, requires Kalshi to implement a multi-source geofencing system provided by GeoComply — one of the largest commercial geolocation vendors in the US gaming industry — and to have it fully operational by August 12, 2026. If Kalshi misses that deadline, it will be subject to $120,000 in daily fines until compliance is confirmed. NGCB Chair Mike Dreitzer said Kalshi had already begun working with GeoComply on implementation at the time the agreement was announced.
The contempt proceedings arose from what the NGCB described as systematic failures in Kalshi's geofencing implementation after a May 18 court order required the company to block Nevada users from accessing sports, election, and entertainment event contracts. Board investigators subsequently purchased prohibited contracts on the Kalshi platform eight times across four days — May 28, 30, 31, and June 1, 2026 — while physically located inside Nevada, defeating Kalshi's in-house geofencing system. The system Kalshi built in response to the original May court order cost approximately $190,000 and relied primarily on IP address data. GeoComply's Senior Vice President Chad Kornett testified at the July contempt hearing that commercial-grade geofencing solutions can typically be implemented in one to two weeks — directly undercutting Kalshi's earlier argument that compliant geofencing was technically prohibitive.
The GeoComply requirement is significant beyond the Nevada case. Kalshi simultaneously faces an August 12 geofencing deadline in Michigan — imposed July 13 after the state extended its temporary restraining order and raised the daily fine to $500,000 — and the Michigan compliance plan also involves GeoComply's technology. The convergence on GeoComply as the mandated vendor across two states reflects both its dominant position in the US gaming geolocation market (it is used by virtually all state-licensed sports betting operators) and the court record showing that Kalshi's proprietary IP-based blocking tool was inadequate in practice. What constitutes compliant geofencing in a state-court context has now effectively been defined: a commercial multi-source system from a recognized geolocation vendor, not an in-house tool built to a cost target.
The Nevada settlement resolves one strand of what had become the most adversarial regulatory confrontation in Kalshi's history. Nevada was the first state where geofencing enforcement reached the contempt stage — ahead of Michigan, where the original June 19 federal court ruling was followed by state-court enforcement that escalated separately. The settlement does not end the underlying litigation: the Nevada preliminary injunction remains in force and the NGCB's case against Kalshi continues. What it ends is the immediate contempt standoff, giving Kalshi a defined compliance path rather than an imminent judicial finding of contempt. Whether the GeoComply system performs as required — blocking Nevada residents while not blocking traders who happen to be passing through the state or using VPNs — will be tested when the NFL regular season begins in September, the highest-volume period for sports event contracts on any platform.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Launches Gold and Silver Perpetual Futures After CFTC Approval — First Non-Crypto Perps Cleared in the US
Kalshi launched perpetual futures on gold and silver on September 10 after the CFTC approved the contracts — making them the first non-cryptocurrency perpetual futures to receive US regulatory clearance. The contracts are cash-settled, never expire, and trade 24/7 using Pyth Network price feeds. Kalshi simultaneously has pending applications for perpetual futures on US equities, copper, and currencies. Since receiving CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in late May, Kalshi has done $44 billion in notional volume on those contracts. The gold and silver launches represent Kalshi's most direct competitive move yet against the CME and COMEX as established US commodity exchanges.
Robinhood Agrees to Exit Michigan Sports Contracts by October 9 — Court-Approved Deal Described as Blueprint
Robinhood Derivatives has agreed to stop offering new sports event contracts to Michigan customers by September 9 and close all outstanding positions by October 9, under a court-approved stipulation signed by US District Judge Paul Maloney on September 4. Michigan agreed not to enforce state gambling laws against Robinhood while the company complies. The deal preserves Robinhood's CEA preemption argument and keeps multiple Sixth Circuit appeals — involving Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Kalshi — on track. Legal Sports Report called the agreement a potential 'blueprint' for how platforms and states might reach interim accommodations during the ongoing litigation.
Kalshi Seeks Ninth Circuit En Banc Rehearing While Robinhood Files Separate SCOTUS Petition
Kalshi filed a petition for en banc rehearing at the Ninth Circuit on September 9, asking the full 11-judge court to overturn the August 28 3-0 panel ruling that Nevada can regulate its sports contracts as gambling. Simultaneously, Robinhood filed its own separate certiorari petition with the Supreme Court challenging the same Ninth Circuit ruling. The two platforms are pursuing parallel legal strategies from the same defeat: Kalshi seeking a better ruling at the Ninth Circuit first; Robinhood going directly to SCOTUS. New Jersey has already filed a SCOTUS petition from the Third Circuit's April ruling. There are now two separate cert petitions before the Supreme Court on the prediction market question.